Not like Electron, not very many mainstream desktop purposes are constructed with Tauri, not less than, not but. A few of which may be because of Electron’s legacy presence, or the relative complexity of Rust versus JavaScript. However a good variety of apps, each business and open supply, have been written with Tauri. The pgMagic GUI consumer for PostgreSQL, the Payload file switch instrument, and the Noor workforce chat app are examples.
Payload, a file switch app written in Tauri. The runtime reminiscence footprint is a mere 4MB on Microsoft Home windows, however the app has entry to simply about all the identical system-level performance as an Electron app.
IDG
Which is best: Tauri or Electron?
Proper now, Electron stays essentially the most outstanding and well-understood of the cross-platform UI frameworks. For all of the criticism levied towards it, it’s nonetheless a preferred default selection for delivering cross-platform purposes with good system integration and a wealthy GUI. However complaints about Electron’s reminiscence consumption and the scale of its binaries are legitimate, and so they aren’t going away quickly. They’re intimately tied to the design of Electron apps, and solely a redesign of both Electron or the underlying browser parts will repair that concern.
Tauri apps are designed in another way from the bottom up to make use of much less disk house and fewer reminiscence. However that comes at the price of it being a more moderen know-how that depends closely on Rust—a comparatively new language, additionally with a comparatively new improvement ecosystem. A dedication to Tauri requires a dedication to each Rust and JavaScript, for the again finish and entrance finish, respectively.
