It is common for a high-profile businessman to draw a variety of lawsuits. However by any commonplace, Elon Musk is spending a variety of money and time on lawsuits.
Musk and his corporations — particularly Tesla, SpaceX, and X (previously referred to as Twitter) — preserve operating into controversies, whether or not it is over whether or not the merchandise truly work in addition to they’re presupposed to, the billionaire’s pay construction, his hiring practices, and even his firing practices.
He has additionally turn into a magnet for private lawsuits. Musk is concerned in messy litigation with Claire Boucher, AKA Grimes, the mom of three of Musk’s kids. He has additionally launched lawsuits of his personal by means of his corporations, wading into arguments about free speech on the web. Musk usually depends on Alex Spiro, his longtime private lawyer, to battle and coordinate the lawsuits.
Enterprise Insider has combed by means of courtroom data and created an inventory of probably the most important authorized challenges on Musk’s docket. Tesla shareholders are weighing a few of these points as they resolve whether or not to approve a pay package deal that was estimated to be value $55 billion in 2018— which might be the biggest pay package deal in historical past.
The lawsuits and authorities investigations into Musk and his corporations vary from discriminatory hiring practices to allegations that a few of Tesla’s options do not work as marketed.
A few of his highest-profile battles — such because the current withdrawal of a lawsuit in opposition to OpenAI and founder Sam Altman, the courtroom victories over Musk’s “funding secured” tweet and “pedo man” tweets, his losses in opposition to an anti-hate group and the SEC over a “Twitter sitter,” and his settlement with a Black Tesla worker who was the sufferer of racist discrimination — have been resolved, and are not included on this listing.
Along with his huge wealth, Musk may stand to achieve from supporting Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump within the 2024 election. Over the previous a number of years, Musk’s politics have drifted rightward, and there have been experiences he was being thought-about for an advisory position in a second Trump administration if the previous president wins the election. Because the chief of the manager department, Trump — who in his first time period used the levers of the federal authorities for his personal profit — may search to pressure businesses to drop investigations and ongoing instances in opposition to Musk and his corporations.
Spiro and representatives for Elon Musk didn’t instantly reply to BI’s requests for remark.
Anna Webber/Selection/Getty Photos
Lawsuits introduced by Musk
Musk v. Media Issues
The difficulty: Musk’s firm X Corp. filed a lawsuit in Texas in opposition to the liberal advocacy group Media Issues in November, alleging the group launched a “blatant smear marketing campaign” in opposition to X.
What is going on on: Final 12 months, Media Issues revealed a report that indicated X was putting promoting content material subsequent to pro-Nazi posts on the social media website. The nonprofit’s report appeared to launch one other promoting exodus from Musk’s social media website.
Musk claims in his lawsuit that the group manipulated its findings and cherry-picked data. In response, Media Issues president Angelo Carusone known as it “a frivolous lawsuit meant to bully X’s critics into silence.”
The difficulty has broadened into investigations from right-wing state attorneys common in Texas and Missouri, who’re inspecting whether or not Media Issues broke civil legal guidelines with its reporting on Musk’s social media firm.
Media Issues laid off a number of staff in Could, blaming the “authorized assault” that it says restricted its assets.
What’s subsequent: Media Issues filed a movement to dismiss Musk’s lawsuit in March, however a decide has but to rule.
Gina Carano v. Disney
The problems: Actress Gina Carano is suing Disney after it fired her from “The Mandalorian” after she made posts on X evaluating the remedy of conservatives in America to Jews in Nazi Germany. One put up additionally engaged in Holocaust denial, claiming that “1000’s” of Jews have been “rounded up,” somewhat than tens of millions. X is funding the lawsuit, and Musk has championed it on the platform.
What is going on on: Musk has promised to help lawsuits supporting individuals who have been fired due to their X posts, and Carano’s is a take a look at case for that undertaking, which Musk says is supposed to guard free speech.
The lawsuit, crafted by boutique conservative legislation agency Schaerr Jaffe, focuses on California labor legal guidelines that defend political activism exterior the office.
Disney has filed a movement to dismiss the case, arguing the corporate has a First Modification proper to not affiliate with Carano’s views, which additionally embody criticism of vaccine mandates and questioning the outcomes of the 2020 election.
What’s subsequent: The decide overseeing the case has but to rule on the movement to dismiss the lawsuit.
Musk v. NLRB
The problems: Musk’s Tesla is combating a choice by the Nationwide Labor Relations Board that the electric-car firm CEO violated labor legal guidelines again in 2018 when he tweeted that Tesla staff may lose their inventory choices in the event that they unionized.
What is going on on: A 3-judge panel of the fifth US Circuit Court docket of Appeals final 12 months upheld the NLRB’s discovering that Musk’s tweet unlawfully threatened Tesla staff’ advantages. Musk’s Could 21, 2018 tweet on the middle of the matter learn: “Nothing stopping Tesla workforce at our automotive plant from voting union. May accomplish that tmrw in the event that they wished. However why pay union dues & surrender inventory choices for nothing? Our security file is 2X higher than when plant was UAW & everyone already will get healthcare.”
Attorneys for Tesla — which argued that Musk’s tweet couldn’t be interpreted as a menace — requested the federal appeals courtroom to rethink the ruling. That request was granted.
What’s subsequent: The complete fifth Circuit heard oral arguments within the case earlier this 12 months, and the 17-judge panel has but to concern a ruling.
VCG/Getty
Authorities lawsuits and investigations
SEC investigation into Musk’s Twitter takeover
The problems: The Securities and Change Fee is investigating Elon Musk’s Twitter buy.
What is going on on: The SEC and Musk have an extended historical past collectively. In October, the company introduced it had opened an investigation into his $44 billion buy of the social media firm. The SEC hasn’t mentioned particularly what it is trying into — solely that the probe considerations his buy of Twitter inventory and his 2022 statements and SEC filings referring to his buy.
What’s subsequent: In Could, Musk agreed to testify within the investigation, which stays ongoing.
Tesla Autopilot investigation
The problems: Justice Division prosecutors — in addition to regulators from different federal businesses — are trying into Tesla’s claims of self-driving.
What is going on on: Federal prosecutors are inspecting whether or not Tesla dedicated wire fraud or securities fraud with exaggerated claims of self-driving utilizing the vehicles’ “Autopilot” function. The Securities and Change Fee can also be trying into whether or not traders have been misled by the claims, based on Reuters. And in a separate probe, the US Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration is trying into experiences of Tesla crashes involving the Autopilot function.
What’s subsequent: Tesla has already issued remembers — which, in its case, simply means a software program replace — so as to add extra safeguards to its Autopilot function. Tesla remembers are primarily simply software program updates, and the corporate already issued a recall on 2 million of its automobiles so as to add extra safeguards to its Autopilot function. The NHTSA remains to be trying into whether or not these updates have been enough.
The corporate additionally lately settled a civil lawsuit over a crash that killed an Apple engineer whereas one among its vehicles was in Autopilot mode — one among a number of dozen Tesla deaths involving the function.
Tesla steering loss investigation
The problems: The US Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration is investigating 1000’s of complaints that drivers of Tesla’s Mannequin Y and Mannequin 3 automobiles all of the sudden misplaced steering management.
What is going on on: The investigation started in 2023. Earlier this 12 months, the company superior its investigation and sought extra data from Tesla.
What’s subsequent: The probe’s current improve to the “engineering evaluation” stage suggests the NHTSA could quickly concern a Tesla recall.
NLRB v. SpaceX
The problems: In a criticism earlier this 12 months, the NLRB accused Musk’s SpaceX of illegally firing eight staff for criticizing Musk in an open letter.
What is going on on: The previous staff alleged that they have been terminated in 2022 over their involvement within the open letter to SpaceX executives that known as Musk’s public conduct “a frequent supply of distraction and embarrassment for us.” The NLRB filed its criticism in reference to the matter earlier this 12 months.
What’s subsequent: In response to the criticism, SpaceX sued the NLRB in federal courtroom, alleging that the federal government company’s construction is unconstitutional. An appeals courtroom handed Musk a authorized win in Could when it quickly blocked the NLRB’s case in opposition to the rocket firm.
SpaceX lawsuit for not hiring refugees
The problems: The Justice Division’s civil rights division filed a lawsuit alleging SpaceX illegally discriminated in opposition to asylees and refugees by refusing to rent them.
What is going on on: The lawsuit, filed in August, pointed to Elon Musk’s personal social media posts the place he claimed that US legislation requires “at the least a inexperienced card” to be employed at SpaceX for nationwide safety causes. That merely is not true, the Justice Division alleged.
As a substitute of suing in a federal district courtroom underneath a Senate-confirmed decide, the Justice Division introduced the lawsuit by means of an administrative courtroom, the place the judges are appointed by the US Lawyer Normal. SpaceX sued in a federal district courtroom in Texas over this association, and a decide agreed with the corporate, ruling in November that there have been constitutional issues with the association.
What’s subsequent: The case has been gummed up within the federal district courtroom in Texas, because the Justice Division and SpaceX change volleys over the jurisdiction for various elements of the lawsuit. The US Supreme Court docket has additionally proven a willingness to rethink the constitutionality of administrative legislation judges in several businesses, and pending choices from the excessive courtroom may proceed to change the trajectory of the SpaceX case.
Tesla racism lawsuit
The problems: The US Equal Employment Alternative Fee sued Tesla in September, alleging Black staff at a California manufacturing facility have been subjected to racist harassment.
What is going on on: The federal company’s lawsuit joined dozens of different instances from Tesla employees who’ve mentioned they skilled racist abuse. One worker, Owen Diaz, gained a significant victory when Tesla was ordered to pay $3.2 million in a racial discrimination case.
What’s subsequent: A federal decide denied a movement to dismiss the EEOC lawsuit in March, placing it on the trail for a trial.
Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Photos
Private lawsuits in opposition to Musk
Tornetta v. Musk
The problems: Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta sued Musk and Tesla in a category motion lawsuit concerning Musk’s compensation package deal, which was value $55.8 billion on the time.
What is going on on: In 2018, Tesla arrange a pay plan for Musk that concerned a 10-year grant of 12 tranches of inventory choices that might vest when Tesla hit sure targets tied to the automaker’s market worth and income. Musk was capable of hit all 12 targets in 2023. With every milestone, Musk obtained inventory equal to 1% of excellent shares on the time of the grant.
Tornetta’s lawsuit alleged that the pay package deal was “past the bounds of cheap judgment” and claims Musk had influenced the board’s approval of the plan, together with by means of his shut private relationships with board members akin to his brother Kimbal Musk.
Tesla has argued that compensation was wanted to keep up Musk’s consideration and shareholders have benefited from the affect Musk’s management has had on Tesla’s inventory, which has climbed dramatically since 2018.
The Delaware Court docket of Chancery struck down Musk’s pay package deal in January. Musk is attempting to regain the pay package deal by one other route, with a Tesla shareholder vote this week.
What’s subsequent: Should is predicted to make use of the vote to ask the Delaware Chancery Court docket to rethink its determination, hoping that shareholder approval will assist persuade the decide that the pay package deal is smart. He is additionally prone to proceed interesting the case if he loses.
Boucher v. Musk
The problems: Claire Boucher, AKA Grimes, and Musk have every filed dueling lawsuits in a custody dispute in California and Texas, respectively.
What is going on on: The Musk-Grimes custody battle started in September when the CEO sued his ex-partner to “set up the parent-child relationship” with their three children: X Æ A-XII, Exa Darkish Sideræl, and Techno Mechanicus. In his petition, the billionaire mentioned he filed the lawsuit after he realized Grimes “was not returning to Texas with their youthful kids.” Three-year-old X has remained with Musk.
A number of weeks later, Grimes sued Musk in San Francisco courtroom, searching for major bodily custody and joint authorized custody of the pair’s three kids.
What’s subsequent: The case was sealed in January and remained ongoing as of April, when Enterprise Insider was final capable of view the docket. Neither aspect has publicly indicated that the case has been resolved.
Benjamin Brody v. Musk
The problems: California man Benjamin Brody filed a defamation lawsuit in opposition to Musk in Texas final 12 months, alleging that the billionaire amplified a conspiracy concept that falsely affiliated the faculty graduate with a neo-Nazi extremist group.
What is going on on: Brody’s lawsuit accuses Musk of boosting the claims on his X social media website and says Brody endured “extreme private harassment and everlasting harm to his popularity.” Musk’s “private endorsement of the false accusation in opposition to” Brody reverberated throughout the web, reworking the accusation from nameless rumor to gospel reality for a lot of people, and inflicting others to make use of Musk’s endorsement to justify their need to harass Ben Brody and his household,” the lawsuit says. In a deposition, Musk mentioned he did not know who Brody was.
What’s subsequent: Brody’s lawsuit is searching for $1 million in damages and a trial by jury. Musk’s attorneys have filed a movement to dismiss the lawsuit.
Twitter severance lawsuits
The problems: Tons of of former Twitter staff are suing X for unpaid severance.
What is going on on: When Elon Musk took over Twitter, he rapidly fired 1000’s of staff — he claimed over 80% — and did not pay any severance to a lot of them. In courtroom filings, X claims the merger settlement that allowed Musk to manage Twitter did not require any funds and that the previous staff don’t have any standing to sue as a result of they weren’t a part of the merger.
Even former Twitter executives have sued Musk over severance. Twitter’s former chief accounting officer, Robert Kaiden, alleged the Musk falsely accused him of misconduct so he may hearth him with out paying out severance. Kaiden mentioned he is owed $3.75 million in unpaid severance.
There are a number of completely different lawsuits in several districts. Litigation has stalled in most of them as a California courtroom weighs whether or not to show one among them — asking for $500 million in damages — right into a class-action lawsuit. A number of lawsuits additionally allege Musk discriminated in opposition to them due to their race, gender, or incapacity in selecting to fireplace them.
What’s subsequent: Deciding a category motion certification for the California case may take years. In the mean time, Twitter has weighed settling a few of the claims.
Agrawal v. Musk
The problems: 4 former Twitter executives (ex-Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal, ex-Twitter CFO Ned Segal, ex-head of authorized, coverage, and belief at Twitter Vijaya Gadde, and ex-senior authorized counsel at Twitter Sean Edgett) sued Musk and X in March, alleging the corporate didn’t pay out tens of millions of {dollars} in severance.
What is going on on: After Musk took over Twitter in 2023, he terminated the 4 executives inside minutes.
The executives have been set to obtain golden parachutes, however declare Musk and X haven’t paid them out. The group says X collectively owes them $128 million in severance.
Musk has mentioned he fired the executives for trigger and doesn’t owe them something. In August, Agrawal, Segal, and Gadde individually sued Twitter for over $1 million, alleging the social media firm hadn’t paid the authorized charges they accrued throughout their time at Twitter.
What’s subsequent: The lawsuits are all in numerous levels, with judges having but to rule on motions to dismiss them.
